>>4271374 pb
But didn't "Q" mention in a crumb that there would be no room for deniability; the evidence and volume of it would be [by implication] too overwhelming?
anybody have a link to that vid.
I only made it half way through.
Thanks in advance for any help
Weird news came out about Pelosi's statements after the dust-up.
She implied it was something like being tickled and then pissed on by a skunk.
Do these people all have shat " tinkle" fetishes or what.
Who even calls it tinkle.
maybe that was a code too?
Didn't dig yet on the man who reported it.
kek