Proving Q

=

A 5-sigma probability is ~1:3,500,000 which is the threshold used in particle physics to define a discovery. That is, if the particle you think you've just discovered doesn't in fact exist, the odds were roughly 3.5M-to-1 against you observing what you did … which is both very unlikely and rather unlucky.

So, what about Q? QProofs.com currently identifies the following pseudo 'proofs': Twitter (19), White House (10), Military (13), Q Clock (15), International (14), Events (14), Swamp (19): that's 104 'proofs' in total.

The problem is that none of these 'proofs' individually constitutes a real proof in the sense of a quantifiable 5-sigma (im)probability. They are merely evidence, not proofs.

Moreover, it's tricky to say for any given 'proof' what the actual odds against it are. To illustrate this, pick a number (any number) between 1-104 … let's say 43.

That is Q Clock(1) which is Q's senate 53-47 prediction posted on Nov 13 @ 12:14 … where the 14 ties in with Trump's later '53 to 47' post on Nov 16 (see the corresponding graphic for details). The odds of that happening are 1:60. If the 12 would also have counted then the odds come down to about 1:43. But Q posted that prediction twice (2318 & 2493), so is it now 1:21? And this is one of the easier ones to quantify!

To repeat this for every 'proof' with any degree of accuracy is well beyond the capability of this humble Anon. Instead, how about we assume an absolutely ridiculously unflattering (i.e. high) probability for each 'proof' of (say) 1-in-2?

So yes, we will assume there was a 1:2 chance of Q correctly predicting the currency of the Bangladeshi NYC bomber(!), the senate majority(!), each of those zero-delta Twitter posts with Trump(!!), the advance knowledge of earth-shaking events in SA, NK & Iran, etc, etc, etc(!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!). That's unarguably ludicrously high, but here's the thing:

if all those 104 * 1:2 probabilities combine (1:21:21:2…) to give a cumulative 5-sigma event then Q is proven even WITHOUT Trump's explicit announcement to that effect, yes?

It turns out that 222 = 4.2M, already beyond 5-sigma. The number 2104 is an insanely huge 2.028E31.

It would be nice if Trump could explicitly confirm Q, but that would force them into defending every single thing Q has posted, e.g. about Merkel & Hitler lol! Even without his overt confirmation though, the assumptions and calculations outlined here PROVE WITH ZERO DOUBT that Q and Trump are working together on this, the biggest real-time intel dump in history.

Fake news media & evil cabal numpties everywhere … sew a button on THAT!!!