Anonymous ID: 14ebbc Dec. 12, 2018, 11:45 a.m. No.4276185   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6207

>>4275886

ty baker!

 

>>4276089

I think is too much of a reach at this point to put in notables, but good to post in bread in case other anons can add evidence to it. Also, we have to be especially skeptical of topics which are known (((JIDF))) slides. Muh freemasons is one of them.

Anonymous ID: 14ebbc Dec. 12, 2018, 12:06 p.m. No.4276547   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4276036, >>4276083

Agreed.

 

Guys, keep your feet on the ground. We're a Mil Intel support operation, focused on politics, MSM codebreaking, and SJW culture-jamming with open-source fact-finding and analysis. Yes, we can have fun trolling media, but when Q calls something "trolling" and "fun" he obvs doesn't mean it to be used as part of our political proofs. Newfags: listen to anons re: shills and their tactics

 

28ea1c

Ho, ho ho

Nigga you sure glo!

>4276207

>Muh masons is a Q topic.

Depends on context, time & place. Connecting a mason jar to a secret coded message about masons in a context having nothing to do with politics or specific crime is an obviously intentional rider to push an agenda, aka, slide.

Anons know freemasonry is one of the many mantles the (((cabal))) wears and operates under, but that freemasonry is not itself the cabal. JIDF shills try pushing muh masonry every chance they get as part of their narrative of look-here-look-there-look-EVERYWHERE-BUT-THE-JEWS agenda.

 

Anons can also see from the many of your already high-post-count posts that you are also participating in and shiling for the over-the-top seeing of nonexistant patterns in pics/vids slide that shills employ often. But I'm sure that's just a (((cohen)))cidence.

I'd suggest now's a good time for an IP hop, but far be it for me to interrupt my enemy when he's making a mistake

Anonymous ID: 14ebbc Dec. 12, 2018, 12:12 p.m. No.4276662   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6703 >>6712

>>4276594

^^This^^

I've worked for defense b4, and know MI is found of using tests even on their own, to get them to sharpen their game, help flush out who's discerning, who will stand up even when it means going against the grain. Q would never want us to abandon logic in the name of being blind followers. Not saying this is an indication to stop trusting Q, not at all. Saying we don't know exactly why he posted it, and we shouldn't automatically jump to conclusions that it goes against the character of everything else he's posted and the nature of the mission he's given us.