The next impeachment trial was that of Judge Robert Archbald of the Commerce Court. In 1913, Archbald was charged with serious acts of misconduct stretching over many years, including using his office to obtain advantageous business deals and free trips to Europe. As in the Swayne case, none of the articles of impeachment charged an indictable offense. Yet, apparently because of the seriousness and extent of the charges, the Senate convicted Archbald. At the conclusion of the trial, the suggestion of an impeachment committee surfaced once again. Archbald’s defense attorney argued that many senators were not in attendance when evidence was taken before the full Senate, relying instead on testimony printed in the Congressional Record, and recommended the use of a committee to hear evidence in future trials.
Q, please tell us how RGB and Rosenstein are doing. They have been quiet lately. Muller probe is a trolling technique by POTUS on the FakeNews Corp!!!
Reflect on POTUS mantel comment and Gov shutdown: Nat Sec
What was in those envelopes that had caused the funeral panic???????