Anonymous ID: b94465 Dec. 12, 2018, 2:06 p.m. No.4278506   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4278313

That asshole's days of freedom may be numbered. Awans yet another BIG one suppressed by Mockingbird.

https://dailycaller.com/2017/11/14/dem-it-aide-used-political-influence-to-have-fraud-charges-dropped-in-pakistan-paper-says/

 

A Democratic IT aide said Imran told him a similar story in a House cafeteria in 2009 and said Imran claimed he persuaded Rahm Emanuel — the Obama White House chief of staff who employed the Awan family during his days as a congressman — to intervene. The Dawn article refers to Imran as a White House employee.

The dropped charges and alleged punishing of victims raise questions about whether congressional employers pulled in favors, and how an IT aide could have such influence. The Awans had access to the emails of 45 members of Congress.

The entire Awan family was on the payroll of House Democrats as IT aides, and most earned as much as chiefs of staffs, taking in more than $5 million in pay. The 45 current members of Congress who employed the crew have refused to criticize him and have not said they’ve done anything to assess the integrity of their data despite a steady stream of suspicious conduct.

The office of Emanuel, who is now mayor of Chicago, did not respond to a request for comment.

Anonymous ID: b94465 Dec. 12, 2018, 2:24 p.m. No.4278768   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4278534

Q for lawfags: Have been attempting searches (DDG, Bng, Brave's browser, Yandex…) and cannot find anything pertaining to an "Entertaiment" classification loophole pertaining to these parasites. It must exist somewhere. Outfits label themselves as "news", however if that were truly the case, Libel & Slander laws would have put them out of business long ago (fame notwithstanding, see Hulk Hogan).

Believe it goes deeper than Smith-Mundt being repealed, as they ceased being "news" prior to jugears repealing it anyway. Libel & Slander, however, are off the rails so they MUST be legally classified merely as "entertainment", correct?