>>4284486

>We need to

"We need to…"?

If there's something you want to do, anon, do it.

>>4284700

I've posted this so many times.

Maybe you should read it?

Thu, Dec 13 –– House Oversight: Oversight Of Nonprofit Orgs: Case Study On the Clinton Foundation. Two Clinton Foundation Whistleblowers Testifying Publicly. Oversight committee also asked DoJ officials to come in & give status report on various matters they've been assigned to investigate– including Clinton Foundation and Uranium One deal. Huber testimony expected. Tom Fitton (Judicial Watch) to testify at 2pm. –– "https://oversight.house.gov/hearing/oversight-of-nonprofit-organizations-a-case-study-on-the-clinton-foundation/ ;

John Solomon on Fox News / Hannity (Dec 13th);

https://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/susan-jones/house-republicans-expect-learn-more-about-clinton-foundation-probe-next

https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-president-tom-fitton-to-testify-before-the-house-committee-on-oversight-and-government-reform-2/"

>>4284756

>>4284719

That's not what open interest means.

Open interest means how many contracts are open on the commodity exchange.

Multiple claims on a single physical ounce while very true, is a totally different statistic, not easily calculated from Comex data.

>>4284866

Full agreement on that

>>4284890 In the best of all worlds, POTUS would have gone Patton on him and slapped the crap out of him. Alas…can't be done…yet.

>>4284997

My, that's a terse summary. Yes, accurate, but terse.

I guess newanons need education on these matters. Anon watched this scene for 20+ yrs.