>>4287527 (pb)

>Q uses 'shudder quotes' around "Guardians". This suggests irony (introduces ambiguity: double meaning, unusual meaning, or changing meanings depending upon context)

"Guardians" strikes me as coming from Plato's Republic. A guardian is, for Plato, one of the dual aspects of (political) leaqders that he thinks should be looked for if we plan to implement justice (plato's justice is much different from the procedural justice of our republic…). The other required aspect is the "philosopher". any chance of righteous rule requires leadership that is at once of the guardian type as well as the philosopher type.

>>4290847

>who is the pope's Guardian in Q1413 with pic of owl?

no idea…moloch or something? key point (again from Plato, though am now interpreting which is fraught with danger) is that you need both guardian and philosopher…..because of how the types go about gettin shit done……the guardian has worked out ends in mind (structured goals is how i've seen it put by my classical philosophy betters) that he attempts to achieve via technology…..the philosopher type starts, rather, with the raw material at hand and works to achieve something based on the proclivities of the material. big tech anyone? they give no fucks about the available material (humans or otherwise) and go about manipulating and "driving" it via technology.