Following up on my last post.
Q said:
Why is Big Pharma essential?
Expand your thinking past cures.
Think Google [new Pixel phone].
Think Apple [vs. Samsung].
Why was Blackberry destroyed?
We can guide but you must organically uncover the TRUTH.
THEY are watching.''
ARCHIVE EVERYTHING OFFLINE.
What if we've got cell phones companies over in China because they're actually being designed and tested to be used as medical devices?
In other words, a device that would stimulate and/or measure a physical or mental reaction in humans. Why was Eric Schmidt in North Korea? I'm thinking that one of the reasons was to ensure the Google phones were being tested on humans.
Think about it. We have big pharma suppressing cures for deadly diseases, so why can't we have the cell phone companies quietly developing their phones to not only communicate and destroy privacy, but to do things to the human body? There are opportunities far greater than just mind control, but it requires testing.
Consider the way a new drug is brought to market. It starts with a "discovery" of a compound that has a specific action to which there should be a specific physiological reaction. But there are a lot of factors involved and it requires testing. So, the drug manufacturer applies for an IND (Investigative New Drug) license from the FDA.
To comply with the IND, some basic toxicity tests are run and some efficacy tests are run on folks who volunteer. In general it might be folks who have one foot in the grave and are sliding fast, for whom no other treatment is available, or it may be a very benign drug for a condition that isn't life threatening. They have to be volunteers and the efficacy trials are very limited. The point is that part of the IND is some clinical trials under extremely rigid conditions that test on humans.
Based on good results (meaning they think it would be a profitable drug), they go back to the FDA and apply for an NDA (New Drug Application) and if they get that, then there are years worth of tests that have to be completed and an enormous amount of data that has to be collected. They'll spend anywhere from $50million to $500million but they'll get the patents and have the opportunity for windfall profits.
But, there's always a possibility that they could be surprised after spending a hundred million dollars and discover that the drug will never be licensed because of some problem nobody could predict.
So, wouldn't it be easier if one could go to a place where life was cheap and do direct testing on people to get a good idea of what works and what doesn't, as well as what side effects and other issues might come up before spending the big bucks in the US?
Think about it. Do you really think that shit isn't already in place?
Why do you suppose there is so much effort by the clowns to ensure that whistle-blowers are identified before anyone hears the whistle?
Now go back and look at the "mysterious" deaths of scientists in different fields. Wonder how much correlation there is between Operation Mockingbird and those deaths there really is? Why did we get the online whistleblower sites? Because they could no longer control the information after the internet genie was released. So they offered a "solution".
But let's get back to cell phones and mind controlled mass shooters.
So, if you're wanting to do some mind-control testing with cell phones, why not co-opt the big pharma setup that's already in place in countries where life is cheap and the leaders don't really give a shit as long as they get a cut of the pie? Cut a deal. In fact, it becomes a partnership because with certain types of EM radiation produced by the cell phones, it's going to impact the performance of certain drugs already on the market as well as drugs already in development.
Is this activating any almonds out there?