Question to tech people, does anything prevent q from posting as anon? Just to give some ideas or directions without doxxing or such post is unsecure and can be traced back?

>>429247

Yes but in terms of tracing back was his connection more secure or the same?

>>429259

If we assume TRUST SESSIONS, and then friendly sources start putting pressure on sessions that was the tactic used. I am not sure we need to use it on POTUS. I would be more comfortable using that on sessions. With POTUS, i think Q would tell us directly smth like be loud on POTUS

>>429357

We cant post on ga, you meant on regular thread?

>>429404

Wow i didnt know that, sick with flu fell asleep

>>429404

Question, how did he tell you that you can post on ga, i dont see in post history

So Q predicted self destruction, does anybody have related post handy?

>>429538

Ty

>>429544

I asked for this post, i believe this is relevant

>>429712

Podesta emails

>>429731

Also maybe related weird scars on obamas head

>>429749

He is a shill not retard. If someone puts idea once and its shut down with logic, reasonable people usually move on . This anon goes on and on. Trying to extract reaction. Just filter

>>429787

Whats your logic behind this suggestion?