>>4292230

this occurred to me as well

i have considered just what that might might be

and the only thing it seems it could be is lack of expanded thinking

but then i ask well what would represent that if it was a success?

after all it does not seem that asking lots of questions can be a failure and few - if any - were shitposts or concernfag posts and many questions were answered

so as much as i am willing to take personal responsibility for a failure i simply cannot find one

anyone else? if WE have failed or just can do better let us figure out what and DO IT

anons? WHAT CAN WE DO BETTER?

WWG1WGA

>>4292327

ANONS

Lawfag here

there is ONE open and shut argument that proves this story is fake and gay

that is the FEC ALREADY RULED SUCH PAYMENTS ARE NOT contributions - in the john edwards case - tons of sauce

here is one YAHOO news

spread it

John Edwards' Hush Money Was Not Illegal, FEC Told Campaign

https://www.yahoo.com/…/john-edwards-hush-money-not-illegal-fec-told-121722338…

May 14, 2012 - John Edwards' Defense Gambles on FEC Ruling That OK'd Donations. .

>>4292451

another shitposter