Anonymous ID: 0a0447 Dec. 13, 2018, 11:25 a.m. No.4294891   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4294418, >>4294305 lb

>Credit to anon 2 breads back for the meme/title

It's great, ty baker.

Here's wishing all our DS (((frens))) a Merry Gitmas

 

>>4294319 lb, >>4294382 lb

>Anywhere from double-digit to low triple-digit views per dough.

Great, ty baker. That's about where I was.

Indicates a shit ton of lurkers! Wew.

>post a pastebin. some anon is gifting pro accounts.

Not sure my bakes are the kind he'd want to facilitate more of, wouldn't wanna put him in an uncomfortable position kek. But on behalf of all bakers, many thanks for the generous gift PastebinProAnon

.

>>4294322 lb, >>4294340 lb

>to see if they are behaving.

Kek. I agree we should all take active stake in baking, to uphold/safeguard our standards. I disagree if it means policing anons/bakers for (((subject content))), even if it's in good faith on basis of it being so unPC as to rattle shills or discourage normies, but I'm aware it creates a lot of upset on the board when controversy is put front-and-center as happens w/notes. I do it for purposes of pushing the Overton Window in the direction of we need it to go (difficult truths that can only be said here) and preventing our culture from becoming too normie-fied, but I also think pushing too much too fast is bad for the board. Baking Persona aside, I do monitor and adjust for that: slow and steady is my aim, not chaos.

 

>>4294340 lb

>i’m sure anons check the pastebin to see who’s baking too

Gotta admit, I'm a little concerned about this becoming a kind of soft-namefagging. Especially if that name carries other issues (a doxxed IRL identity & femfagging/flirting in particular) that lead to the loosening of our board rules in ways that can damage it. Not sure what we should do about it tho.