USA will be bound by UN migration compact

Answering a question by AfD member Martin Hebner on October 12, Chancellor Angela Merkel said:

"If the pact that goes back to the UN General Assembly next week is debated and adopted, then a Member State may demand a vote. The vote is such that if two-thirds of the UN countries agree, then [the pact] is valid for all. That's how it is when it comes to majority decisions."

"Wenn bei der UNO-Vollversammlung nächste Woche der Pakt noch einmal zur Debatte steht und angenommen wird, dann kann ein Mitgliedsstaat Abstimmung verlangen. Diese Abstimmung muss dann so sein, dass zwei Drittel der Länder der VN dem zustimmen, und dann ist es für alle gültig. Das ist nun mal so, wenn es um Mehrheitsentscheidungen geht."

https://www.fdesouche.com/1125229-pacte-de-lonu-sur-les-migrations-selon-merkel-une-fois-definitivement-adopte-a-new-york-il-sera-valable-pour-tous-les-pays

https://www.journalistenwatch.com/2018/12/13/migrationspakt-angela-merkel/

>>4294543

>>4294550

>>4294560

>>4294580

>>4294614

>>4294618

>>4294661

>>4294725

It's complicated. The US veto power at the UN security countil is kinda important.

Funny thing is, the Migration compact establishes principles that override the rights listed in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights of 1948, due to its article 29.

> These rights and freedoms may in no case be exercised contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.

Free speech? Not if it's against the UN principle of free migration.

It's a big deal. This is HISTORIC for the Islamic world, because their Sharia law is imposed onto the world. Look up the Cairo Declaration of Human Rights in Islam. Article 12 will shock you.

http://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/instree/cairodeclaration.html

>>4294924

Vote failed to pass.

https://www.lexpress.fr/actualite/politique/la-motion-de-censure-contre-le-gouvernement-a-ete-rejetee_2053307.html