Anonymous ID: 55389d Dec. 13, 2018, 12:56 p.m. No.4296875   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6935 >>6992 >>7252 >>7549

Financed out of their own pockets. These are the facts, not your facts, not our facts.

 

We used the FOIA substantially to gain public and non-public information.

 

Our claim is a tax claim. The foundation operated outside the bounds of its approval that came from the IRS - that's our claim.

 

We went to the 990's. We started with the returns that the Foundation filed. There were their revenue sources and their expenses.

 

Less than 1/10 of 1% of the donors gave 80% of the money, so we following the money.

Anonymous ID: 55389d Dec. 13, 2018, 12:58 p.m. No.4296935   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4296875

We sourced contracts, MOU's, interractions with foreign governments between senior foundation execs and government officials.

 

The foundation should have registered under NARA. The foundation is not entitled to 501(c)(3).

Anonymous ID: 55389d Dec. 13, 2018, 1 p.m. No.4296992   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4296875

The organization was a closely held partnership to advance the financial interests of its principals.

 

The private foundations that donated to the Clinton Foundations are subject to tax payments unless they meet specific conditions.

Anonymous ID: 55389d Dec. 13, 2018, 1:23 p.m. No.4297549   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4296875

 

Mozambigue 2002: CF had a Memorandum of Agreement to work on behalf of their Ministry of Health. This was not a Clinton foundation program per se. They were there to support the Ministry of Health. In laymans terms: they were brokering money and pharmaceutical sales.