>>4305189 (lb)
>on shills and where they're seemingly headed
Hm. So [they] are trying to subvert more now, because [they] are finding that directly disputing confirmed shit doesn't work well for [them].
I've been seeing it during the day shift over past couple of weeks, too; a poster blatantly shills anons to try to get them to not push back against false information, while quoting source that points doing that out as a shill tactic.
Yep, [they]'re that stupid.
See I went the other direction with it..
That poster pressing the issue for 3+ breads, amid anon disagreeance == shill.
Shills: Try this trick and spin it
Anons: Mood music for fucking off shills
>>4305554 One of the owners of Backpage.com gave $10,000 Nancy Pelosi’s super PAC
So Nancy took money from pedophiles?
Bye.
If Q were to become unsatisfied here they would be blatant about it, just like they did for every other migration.
-t. saw all of the migrations except the one from /pol/