Ingraham is so dumb-blonde it's obnoxious.
Pussy Killer Miller did a wonderful job, however.
Depends on whose definition.
Can the brood of a Jew ever be not a Jew or is like being a nigger to you?
Because generally those are the only people I see bitching about in all spectrums of the title.
being a muslim is a lot more involved than being a Christian, which basically means you parents dragged you to church as a kid, but like… maybe you're spiritual or something but Jesus is comfortable so sure, christian or something.
Is that a Christian, to you?
Is Christianity as unified as Islam?
Kaaay… so you're just a Christian because you decide you are.
Can someone decide to be a Jew?
Q WANTED US TO MAKE PEPE THE BAKER MEMES
kek, you're adorable.
So… you decide to be a Christian but you pick and choose which parts you like. Neat.
If you're not picking the part of Christianity that says "Boo Homogays", then who is driving you to have such disdain for them?
Now blend that with Bri Maxeiner, the sous-chef.
Pic is not the sous-chef.
Bri is surprisingly anon.
They deserve no more group power than religious groups.
As for gay marriage, regular marriage kinda wrecked its own shit as well.
Meanwhile, I'm over here not getting tax breaks as a single person and if I'm not buggering someone, no one can see me on my death bed.
What are some of the explicit ways the homogays are breaking things?
Homosexuals are not responsible for the sins of The REEEEEEgressives, thought a lot of them are.
Uhhhh… rape divorce? You mean in court?
Honestly, I'm not pushing for any kind of marriage of until single people get the same rights as privilege as people who are something as arbitrarily labeled as "married".
Great, y'all are fucking! You deserve a tax break? You gots kids? Lots of people has dependents. And?
And it's more that promiscuous people get STDs. Some people are bug chasers. Some people just suck and keep fucking after they know they're infected. You're not supposed to wreck assholes, but even women are into anal, and now you're mixing fluids. Why use a condom if you can't get anyone pregnant? blah blah blah blah blah blah.
Again, how are homosexuals ruining things?
>2) Only if they have kids within 2 years of getting married
Gee, sounds like old school "Consumation Laws"…
And really, that would only be incentive for the poor to have children, which would saddle them with debt, making good little wage slaves or soldiers.
You sure you're not The Jew in this conversation?
>Homos are statistically more promiscuous
Again… no one's getting pregnant. Heterosexual Women on the pill are more promiscuous then women not on the pill. Straight men are… will fuck anything if given the chance. For some dudes, It's just easier to say "fuck it. Make that moist and hole shaped and then I'll return the favor."
>I already answered that.
No, you spouted off a lot of talking points that you probably got from your personal conception of Jew Tales 2.0, or Jew Tales 3.0, but you said you're not a Muslim.
You sound like a cliché, because that's all you use… yet you haven't said what gays are directly destroying.
Like… what bearing does two dudes' relationship have on your relationship?
Right? What if they want to be married for a bit and derp around as a set-in-stone couple?
>remind you that a family who makes less that 24K per year pays no taxes
So then there's only an incentive for wealthy people to have kids? A form of… economic eugenics?
>Homos are still more promiscuous that heteros
I never once argued that they weren't.
>More ad-hominems.
That's all you've offered…
>As long as you don't try to get gay marriage and adoption to be a thing
What's the problem with gay marriage? You haven't established that.
Gay adoption… What about a single woman who adopted a child who has a female roommate? They can't like each other too much?
What about a widower dad who falls in love with a guy. Can the guy not adopt the son as his own?
How about Gay Uncle is only living relative… can't adopt cuz he sucks cock?