>>4308399

>>4308399

>Are you getting angry yet?

>Good, it's working

This is precisely how a plan, script, or movie is designed to work. There are directors that proclaim that if people aren't walking out of the theaters by the end of their flick, they failed.

Anger is good. Anger is right. We all should be completely and utterly fed-THE FUCK-up by now. Whether that's even in the plan/script, it still works to Q's advantage due to the gravity of what they are trying to pull off. I mean, if it's this fucking hard to take down the Clintons, just how hard do you think it'll be to purge the rest of the world of this nonsense?

Litmus tests of emotional response is the tipping point. Either they act on what they have and start rounding fuckers up, soon, or they continue to boil this pot with people like Hal Turner writing articles of inflammatory response to rile up the rest of the sleeping masses.

All of this works into the plan. By the time the tribunals start, even the most staunch liberals have to be chanting "Lock her up!!!" for the crimes she's committed. You think they are going to rally behind "Tax Fraud"?

HA!

The entirety of their evil doings have to be made public, non-partisan delivery (or better yet, partisan on the part of Democrats) in order to even come close to 4-6%. Military breaks you down, rebuilds you, and turns you into a soldier.

Who, here, has the cognitive endurance? I guess we'll see by the time this is finished.

>>4308661

This. Nice "calm your tits" post.

>>4308399

OK, reading this again, Hal's obviously "read in". This article is doing precisely what it's intended to do; rile people up.

>But the two Whistleblowers DID testify they had to send those 6,000 documents to Mr. Huber THREE TIMES because Huber or his staff repeatedly "Lost" them.

We're constantly reminded we're watching a movie, and getting people worked up over Huber seeming like he isn't acting on good information is, again, a great way to piss people off.

Then, dude goes on to actually quote Q:

>Let's go down the list of political "swamp creatures" Trump has been able to get rid of:

That's basically a copy/paste of:

>>>/patriotsfight/373

But then takes a dig at Q later on:

>No matter what Q says, the public ends up right back where we started, with nothing accomplished except a total waste of time.

That's a shill tactic. Anons know what has been achieved, but Hal seems to forget, even though he likes to quote Q, word for word.

Then, he makes a prediction of what we all assume is, indeed, going to happen:

>The President can Blow the whole thing up – and I mean all of it – Release and Declassify ALL OF IT —- FROM JFK to OBAMA.

What have we learned while being here, with Q, about how our gov't has operated until now? JFK all this time later, the truth would do what? Infringe on National Security?

Are you fucking kidding me?

What in the ever living fuck is in the last few documents that sum up what actually happened? Anons are pretty certain that it means Mossad has been running the gov't through the CIA since Eisenhower. Would that totally devastate the normies out there? No, at this point, I don't think anyone would think that was a farce. Why'd Hal bring this up specifically then? Why is he such an "angry anon!"? Because this is part of the show.

This article is great, actually. It's a motivation pill for anons if you are looking through the right perspective.

>>4308739

Control means they control the outcome, not that they can "see into the future". A plan with massive contingencies will still have the same outcome in the end. It might take longer than originally anticipated, but the contingencies ensure success, in the end, regardless of the time it takes.

Control means just that; controlling the outcome.

>>4308792

To make you watch it. They know there's a market, now. Don't fall for it.

>>4308919

McSally incoming.