>>4309795

>muh control

>muh concern

THIS…. Is why protecting civil rights, all of them yes, but ESPECIALLY the 2nd amendment as re-affirmed by the courts, is so vital.

The personal right to openly bear arms shall not be infringed literally means: If anyone renegs on anything, all bets are off.

I have full trust in Patriots, as long as they remain Patriots. And I have seen nothing but Trump being a Patriot.

So he's my guy until he proves otherwise.

>>4309882

>muh warzone… learns 'moran' though!

yeah. psychological warfare is a thing.

As you know. → https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Memetic_warfare

>>4310053

KEK. bumpstocks are a waste of money.

jeans/dungarees have this cool feature called a belt loop.

and thumbs. you need those too.

>>4310082

muh stocks, muh tear cup, where is it…. kek..

It's not really hard to learn how to bumpfire with a normal stance either, doing hip shots is more for shotguns ;p

>>4310136

All of those rules are procedural rules, and are therefore what I would call "color of law".

Technically since they are not laws, they are unconstitutional when held against the backdrop of the 2a.

…And this is why we are here fighting against the administrative state ;)

>>4310163

>Technically since they are not laws, they are unconstitutional when held against the backdrop of the 2a.

Forgot to add:

..But try individually fighting that, and get back to me on how it worked out.

>>4310231

That, is up to us.

Q is not our daddy.

Q is not our genie in a bottle.

Q is giving us the chance to effect this change if we want it.

Q works at the pleasre of the President.

POTUS… wants what Americans want.

POTUS will see that this is desired by the people that elected him, and ACT ON IT if he sees enough support.

After all of the confirms of 5:5… I'm shocked that you would not think to do this.

ALL of the administrative agencies are outside of the parameters the Constitution sets. This was started in earnest by Wilson in 1913.

They should ALL be scrapped/neutered of the power to legislate administratively; DEA, ATF, FDA, all of it.

>>4310104

This is why giving administrators the power to legislate through the edict of procedure is unsupportable. → >>4310163, >>4310179, >>4310326

>>4310441

>You're right. If we want to take it further we're going to have to fight for it.

>We'll have to elect representatives that will vote to abolish these agencies.

>We won't get anything handed to us on a silver platter.

This, is what restoring the Republic is all about. Personal passion for self-rule.

I will bring my own platter for that dish, FWIW.