thanks
megajew is going to be kvetching about how you didn't add something
ignore and carry on bakerfren
thanks
megajew is going to be kvetching about how you didn't add something
ignore and carry on bakerfren
yup, it's muh dick's pasta
I'd protest with the vests for something like illegal immgration/wall/etc
but I'm NOT burning shit down while doing it
90450b = bf6288
90450b = bf6288
90450b = bf6288
90450b = bf6288
90450b = bf6288
90450b = bf6288
90450b = bf6288
90450b = bf6288
90450b = bf6288
nor degenerate enough
is november 25, 1984 really equal to november 25, 2017 in clockfag rules?
it's CTA
that's not the point, they're faggots
>Pay some more attention, anon.
when anons ask simple questions about your irrelevant nonsense, you clockniggers should stop acting like holier than thou faggots who have a dick in your ass
it's part of the reason it's not taken seriously
go back to your thread clocknigger
I hope you know clockfag, this is why there are anons who couldn't care less about the qclock: >>4314856
many (not all) times an anon has a question or a critique of a clock graphic, the clockfag being questioned or critiqued acts like the faggot referenced, so no one takes that clockfag's nonsense seriously
and it seems to be this 'holier than thou', 'if you don't clockfag you're a lesser person' clockfaggot everytime
the moar you know
coming from you megajewfaggot, that makes me think the exact opposite
you're not helping, everything you say is completely irrelevant, much moar than the highest ranking clockfaggot
contribute something relevant
you're literally delusional, actually on Tiresias and 'Freddy' level
REMINDER, IF YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND THIS, OR THINK THIS IS MOAR IMPORTANT THAN THE CRUMBS, MAPS, AND GRAPHICS, YOU'RE NOT AN AUTIST AND YOU'RE A SHILL
you are lesser of an anon if you don't agree with everything I say
> I see too many clockfags making it too difficult for even high IQ anons to understand.
I've tried countless times, and got tired of it months ago
and getting called a newfag, shill, clown, etc for asking constructive or probative questions is ridiculous and unproductive for discussion
there are few anons here that don't question what they see or want to get details about an anon's thoughts or methodology on something they produce, clock or not