CHECK'd
When BO and CM upgrade their schizzlenesses
C'mon, Anons, think outside the fuckin' box 'n' shit
Thinking outside the box!
The industrial age of the 1940’s led to the @USAirForce and the building of the #Pentagon in just 18 months at a time with less bureaucracy. Today’s leaders are looking for ways to continue that innovation. More:
https://youtu.be/PbXdwyWvcRA
cst.
https://twitter.com/DeptofDefense/status/1073804847051407360
After watching the vid, I felt like they were talking to us Anons, they stressed their search for INNOVATIVE minds.
Man, they're calling out to Anons to join them.
That is beautiful, Anon.
Celebrate Anons - Muller on da run, Huber bustin' pedos, POTUS & FLOTUS lookin' fine, Flynn about to be exonerated cuz set-up, The Doyle/Moyhihan team proving a plane with a fuckton of doc.s went to DC AND there is a new mystery prosecute from Little Rock.
HooBoiHowdy, Anons!
Have a goddam beer.
So Where's the 302, Bob? Endgame Nears for Mueller
The whiny submission of Mueller's SC to Judge Emmet Sullivan this afternoon, reeks of panic desperation and arrogance. There's also a critical piece of evidence missing. As Rex explains, Mueller can whine all he wants. None of it will wash with Judge Emmet Sullivan, who will now be incandescent with fury.
Where's the January 302, Bob?
Initially, many of us thought this August 22 interview was a modification of an original 302, written after the January 24 interview.
That would have been suspicious enough. But the reality seems even worse.
And what's missing from Mueller's response? The FBI 302 of the interview between General Flynn and the FBI's Peter Strzok and Joe Pientka, on 24 January 2017.
It seems that a January 302 may not even exist.
Look, there are only two alternatives : either there is a 302 of the Jan 24 interview between General Flynn, Peter Strzok and Joe Pientka, or there is not.
You would hope that any FBI agent interviewing the NSA of the President, would keep contemporaneous notes and record them in a FBI 302. It's not just because it is FBI policy to do so, within 5 days of the interview.
It's because of the importance of the officials involved. As stated, General Flynn was the NSA of an inaugurated US government.
But if there is a 302 of the January 24 interview, it has not been produced to Judge Emmet Sullivan. That's very disturbing. It raises the question : what evidence was used by Mueller to conclude that General Flynn lied to the FBI, in his January 24 interview?
Surely not just the word of the disgraced and fired Peter Strzok, seven months later? That's what it looks like. Because if there's no 302, it appears to indicate that the evidence used by Mueller to trap the General, was based on the interview between Mueller's SC and Peter Strzok, on 22 August.
This, even though the same Peter Strzok admitted that General Flynn did not appear to be lying, when he interviewed him with FBI agent Pientka, on 24 January.
https://quodverum.com/2018/12/348/so-where-s-the-302-bob-endgame-nears-for-mueller.html