Anons, like many others here I prefer tidy decodes and return to re-review as more future proves past.

When Q said, Think FLYNN, in reference to No Name's demise, he used a phrase also found in the title of the Fox News article to which he had linked months previously when drawing attention to the 30 days in which an Anon's appeal, "Free Flynn", was answered by the completion and release of a report by the House Intelligence Committee.

This compared with Hands up. And that invoked comparison between No Name and Flynn – in terms of "on his own terms".

Also there is the problem of Q pointing to timestamps which did not produce the interval of [30] exactly. See the graphic. Both in the case of Flynn and in the later case of No Name the interval did not add-up to 30 days exactly. However, if the end dates are not included, there were 30 days, exactly, between the timestamps that Q highlighted. Same method used in both cases, yes.

In the case of Flynn, Q also said, "Expand". In the case of No Name, Q added "[0:28] Impossible?"

In addition to the 30 day interval between timestamps, Q had given the time of No Name's demise, down to the minute on the day of his death. Q said, "We are in control."

There are other elements within the comparison between Flynn and No Name which I will leave for Anons to ponder. But I will return to this subject later.

As you hunt through the graphic, I am certain you will notice other interesting elements that expand your thinking on what it means for Q to be in control.

I included the anagram that produces the phrase, which again invokes comparison between Flynn and No Name, that one can be hoisted with one's own petard. It appears that for Q to be in control that means allowing that to occur while also concluding the deal on Q terms, not one's own terms.

I do think that Flynn may well be the key that unlocks much, much, much more as future proves past. As many of us do, I anticipate and analyze for current goings-on, but concede that Q drops mostly encourage us to understand what has already occurred and which we already have.

Cheers Anons,

And Allspeed.

>>4319378

Thank you fren.

May I add a bonus anagram which I feel you may well enjoy?

PETARD

=

DEPART

=

PARTED

Where there is truth, there is beauty. But where there is beauty alone, there is no truth.

By this I mean that the pleasure of a tidy decode is sought, often enough, by the unsettled feeling of incompletion, of a missing undeniable, of a reasoned soundness to the pleasure inspired by beauty.

And so: One's Petard resolves to each of the following.

Need Pastor.

Drops Eaten.

One Departs.

Pose a Trend.

Cheers.

>>4319384

Yes, fren, there is no easy way out and nothing will stop what is coming.

One's petard = pose a trend

No Name = One Man

= No, Amen

= Anon me (make me anonymous)

We don't say his name

=

We astonished many

Cheers, Anon.

>>4319385

TESLA resolves from a POTUS Tweet?

The capital letters produce: AEON TESLA.

And that points to the remark:

"Believing that you have a mandate to fix social problems requires a sense of self-importance, even a touch of arrogance."

It is a remark intended by its author as a compliment or an encouragement.

What say you?

Cheers, Anon.