>>4321368 (pb)

small dig on Carter setting up the SES

my initial impression, very much subject to error, is that Carter was trying to simplify a bloated bureaucracy that had been established in the 1880s and was not very appropriate to the needs of the 1970s. He may well have been pressured or tricked into doing the cabal's bidding on the issue of the SES, i.e. the "useful idiot" another anon mentioned.

some interdasting reads:

https://www.govexec.com/management/2018/07/after-40-years-look-back-unlikely-passage-civil-service-reform/149458/

https://www.jimmycarterlibrary.gov/digital_library/sso/148878/61/SSO_148878_061_09.pdf

>>4321541

The silence on those two is deafening, isn't it?

I've chalked it up to DJT not wanting to split the Republican base before it's prudent to do so. I had to cringe at calling for a Red Wave in November, knowing that so many R's are so crooked. But I accepted the need for it lest there be a Blue Wave.

I think DJT knows that what needs to come out of the MAGA process is an abandonment of both major parties, and the establishment of new ones based on more redpilled understandings of the world.

Still, the two parties shouldn't be dismantled simultaneously. First the D's, then the R's.

>>4321597

An example of the kind of 'redpilled' political party I see coming out of the post-D, post-R world is the Free Energy Party.

http://www.freeenergyparty.org/

Now, that party is currently pretty badly run and is not now an effective political machine. They have some really good ideas and values, and a few overly utopian/unrealistic ones, but overall I like their drift.

A party that takes their platform, fleshes it out with stuff they don't really get into (like foreign policy, military affairs, budgets, education, and space policy), weeds out the silliness, and sticks a shrewd and committed leadership on top of it – that to me is the way to go by the mid-2020s.

>>4321853

that's a lovely thought