Anonymous ID: a5ee39 Dec. 15, 2018, 7:56 a.m. No.4321709   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1806

>>4321636

Then how can it be accurate for a 24hr period?

All I'm saying is this: If that number is accurate then great! I know that alot of people are funneled there. If that site gets that much traffic then good on them. The plan is working and people are waking up.

 

But if it's disinfo? IMO anons should not spread disinfo. We have been tasked with finding and distributing the truth. I've never seen that counter reset, but I have seen it in the notables many times for 200k+ in a day. My site doesn't get anywhere near that kind of traffic. It's so far off that I've been wondering if something on my site is broken.

 

If it's fake, take it down. If it's not then I'm wrong. I'll admit it.

Anonymous ID: a5ee39 Dec. 15, 2018, 8:03 a.m. No.4321777   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1779 >>1809

>>4321751

500k < 6.8mm

 

Facebook's latest app data bug exposed the private photos of 6.8m users

 

The data privacy scandals just keep coming for Facebook: the social network has revealed a flaw in its code that could have exposed the private photos of up to 6.8 million users. The security hole has now been patched, but was open for 12 days.

According to Facebook, the bug worked like this: if affected users granted apps access to their timeline photos, those apps could then get at pictures they weren't supposed to be able to see, including images from Facebook Stories and Facebook Marketplace. Even worse, they could see images uploaded to Facebook and not yet posted.

 

That's right โ€“ Facebook keeps copies of pictures you upload to the app and then don't get around to postingโ€ฆ just in case you want to come back and finish off the post. These images are kept for three days before being removed, Facebook says.

https://www.techradar.com/news/facebooks-latest-app-data-bug-exposed-the-private-photos-of-68m-users