Anonymous ID: 0d1873 Feb. 19, 2018, 12:18 p.m. No.432824   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2856 >>2877 >>2893

RE: DEEP DREAM

(sorry am trying to catch up)

>>430834

Sometimes it takes quite a while to get things noticed, it depends who is online in the thread at the time, etc. I made both those graphics - have been trying to get people to understand that Q's reference wasn't to Goog's trippy hippy art thing, but the complete system of overall surveillance across platforms.

>People willingly keeping and updating their own "control file."

Yes, Tempest, Prism, X-keyscore.

Yes digital data is sucked up and stored, that's not the point.

The point is that there is a conscious alliance between tech companies & social media companies with the clowns, just like in that Jason Bourne movie.

Do you REALLY think putting your profile to 'private' protects those pictures. Your kids' account pictures?

Missing from your post (5 image limit I know) is the tie in to the movie Taken that Q mentioned once - what happened in it?

>Pretty girl, overseas is seen by a headhunter/scout

>Scooped up, drugged up, kidnapped and put on the market

Social media platforms are also used as A PEDOPHILE CATALOG (or even for pubescent teens).

Wealthy sickos tell their headhunters looks/qualities they want. Children/teens are selected and put to the prospective buyer.

 

Now you can see the tie in with @Jack hoarding all those dic pics and underage nudies...

 

Q is trying to get us to understand that this was envisioned as a total system - under the nose of the public, and with the public's participation!

Anonymous ID: 0d1873 Feb. 19, 2018, 12:23 p.m. No.432872   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2891 >>3175

>>432856

I know, I saw that I was like 4 threads behind trying to catch up to post this kek, glad those infographs are finally getting some circulation and helping things to 'click' into place!

 

These are some really important dots for the public to SEE connected to each other. So thank you

Anonymous ID: 0d1873 Feb. 19, 2018, 12:38 p.m. No.433024   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3093

>>432877

We already have it bro. Q told us the companies & products, what they are doing, why they are doing it

Google

<home

Amazon

<cloud

<Alexa

Twitter

Facebook

Again - how do you think twatter is going to be able to know whether you have violated their ToS on a different site/platform, offline?

 

Q gave us the bones, we fleshed it out - if we need different graphics to tie it together because anons still don't get it, we might need graphics to tie it together more plainly for the public to get it.

 

Thoughts?