Anonymous ID: 98066b Dec. 15, 2018, 11:10 a.m. No.4323931   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4140 >>4360

>>4323876

Agree!! Pretty active here first part of year. Had to take a break for my sanity. Been back a month. This is a completely different place. I miss the energy, knowledge sharing and open minded past. Unfortunately, everything eventually becomes bastardized

Anonymous ID: 98066b Dec. 15, 2018, 11:29 a.m. No.4324179   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4397

>>4324088

Ruled it constitutional because of the penalty and called it a tax. Penalty (tax) was removed so now it is unconstitutional since the one thing making it constitutional was removed

Anonymous ID: 98066b Dec. 15, 2018, 11:38 a.m. No.4324259   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4324238

The reason it was ruled constitutional was because if the tax penalty. That was removed… therefore that’s why a new lawsuit was brought forth with a judge that said yep unconstitutional as the tax is gone the only thing that scotus was able to use to allow it was removed. 2017 I think it was.