Keep in mind that while some bots are autonomous, others may have an operator (script-assisted shills).
Kek, I just realized radical muslim are effectively bots, so I don't think I have a point.
It's not legitimate criticism when it's hate-filled propaganda.
The propaganda techniques you use betray your motives.
For instance, (pic related) is not legitimate criticism of Islam, it is propaganda.
Mossad infiltrates everything (like CIA), that they get caught and exposed means nothing on their intent.
The UN is not a credible source, they're pro-Islam.
Reports on deleted articles are not a credible source.
Calling people "traitors" is propagand and weakens your case.
Glad to hear you support freedom of speech, though.
If you want to convince anyone, you'll have to source Israel supporting ISIS, or at least explain why you think it would even make sense for them to do so.
And here I am, engaging a muh joo shill. Sorry frens.
>"We have reasons to believe that it was an Israeli strike," the official told AFP on condition of anonymity
Interdasting that a search of the quote returns no result from the AFP.
Could it be… FAKE NEWS?
I'm not saying anything about criticism of Israel. I'm sure they're not saints.
Are they to blame for all the world's woes? I doubt it. Q drops suggest that you are wrong. Hopefully the end is near so we learn how Israel has been bad, and you can finally shut up.
Till then, I am just saying that (((you))) glow, shill.
To mee it looks like pasta propaganda mixed with manual propaganda.
Claims stuff is "sourced" but what I've checked doesn't pass the smell test.
Till I saw you interact with the muh joo shilling I had stopped caring and just got used to scroll through… I'll get back to that.