>>4325854 (lb)

your post implies a dangerous flirtation with a fallacy: that 'good' needs to be balanced with 'evil' or 'bad'.

I suggest you study the I Ching a lot more, and stop glossing over ancient philosophies with misunderstandings.

People might think, following your statement, that 'good deeds' need 'evil deeds' to balance them.

>>4326365

I don't need to 'balance' a good apple with a rotten one.