Is that so? Haven't seen evidence.
Produce visual evidence if you want us to consider this.
Where do the data come from?
Post numbers or actual count of posts on General?
https://www.resignation.info/scripts/8chan/search.php
?
German Archive Anon Mega →
https://mega.nz/#F!LPZxEIYJ!N5JwCNoxOxOtAoErKdUgvw
??
Need data to confirm graphs and do analysis
It might refer to the ability of a US mil spec ops unit to override normal web comms, for example.
Thank you. I believe you.
Stroy__d → de__STROY
I notice this string of letters
Can't think of other English words containing this string, can you?
I love Charles Ortel, but that's a gross mis-statement of what the whistleblowers testified. They said they sent evidence three times IIRC. All they know was that it wasn't acknowledged. Not-acknowledged is not nearly the same as "lost". The third time, they got a phone call, and the US attorney he spoke with asked if he had it in digital form. He replied yes and shipped the US attorney a memory stick containing the documents.
None of that equates to "lost the evidence" FFS. Prosecutors have no duty to confirm receipt of evidence. Maybe they already had a case, already had what evidence they needed to prosecute, I dunno.
>Nice line of reasoning with "destroy"
>Strzok is certainly helping destroy the DS
My thought was only the destruction of texts.