>>4333375 (pb)
Hey Anon, there is another one on page 37/257 on the pdf you linked to. What is going on?
>>4333375 (pb)
Hey Anon, there is another one on page 37/257 on the pdf you linked to. What is going on?
On page 37, it says date of transcription August 28, 2015…and then it says "On September 1…" that seems less likely to be a typo?
Here is the screenshot. What are we looking for? All date discrepancies and make a list?
Yeah, that sounds good…is there a logical explanation for this? It looks like they pre-fabbed evidence, but how could they be that stupid and in your face? Or was the transcription date stamped automatically somehow? Confused.