Thx for the succinct rundown. It reminds me of the situation when Q posted the pic from Antartica and there were a million different directions to go in, some of them more speculative than others. I'm not sure about speculation about infinity signs or other symbols being deception–because a deception is deliberate. Many people speculate in a loosy-goosy sort of way without intending to deceive. But it's not very useful, either, kind of like the press speculating right after a crime has been committed. The q's you asked won't be eay to answer. Godspeed, patriot.
The idea that FB is going after Soros just doesn't add up. We're definitely not getting the whole story here. Somehow, I think we'll ultimately find out that Soros hired someone to make sure he got smeared by his enemies so he could take them out. He's been doing that a lot lately–fake bombs, fake indignation over being criticized, saying people are "anti-semitic, on and on.
Perfectly stated.
That's a good idea. It's pretty common to dig upon reaching a point where either the trail goes cold or there are so many possibilities you have to pause and consider your options. A clue save a lot of time and energy.
It's nice to see someone stand up for sincerity. I miss that in music. probably why I've always like folk music. Really like Stephen Nachmanovich approach to art.
What would you like to say about that? Whether you like him or hate him, he did get railroaded as far as I can tell. Not acceptable for anybody, even the ones we don't like. Due process for all.
Thx for opening a door.
Re shill tactics
Just a comment–tried to post on the possibility of POTUS being on the boards re golf tweets, calling for a digg to find out moar
No big deal, right? Just asking a question?
Reaction from …..somebod(ies), more than one. Very negative, was accused of being a shill, intentionally sliding by people use short nasty phrases and ridicule, sarcasm. I had to drop the inquiry this bread, even tho there have been anons looking into it; I'll bet they're doing the same thing I am: taking a breather.
Digging is hard work; when people are screaming at you while you dig…..well, it's really not worth. We have no way of know who it is; suspect shills, because when I demanded they explain their objections, most just shut up or came back with another nasty.
I don't take it personally but I want to take this opportunity to talk about this, since it just happened. Why is a call for a digg attacked in this way?? People will say shills. But the baker even felt compelled to de-notabalize the post, even though I made it as detailed and precise as possible and included graphic support. I don't blame him; there were also attacks on "comp'd bakers" and the BO (not even him, just generally!).
Anons–including me–are hesitant to push too hard–got jumped for that, too, when reposting to make the material available to differs. Accused of "crying" when I was more like in the mood to punch someone out.
This isn't about me or any individual. Those of us who are solid aren't leaving for stupid reasons. But just "ignoring" broadside attacks doesn't quite work when it's a large group. You think, "well, if the anons don't want this, we'll back off." If it's shills, they've got a real winner with this one.
Did you catch the context of just heard the last little bit? Do you know the source of the clip?