Hi. I just came across this article and wanted to share. It has some very interesting opinions about what the author calls the trump insurgency and the war against the deep state. The author also included a bubblemap of the connections done by Charles Hugh Smith.
shit. Thank you.
https:// medium.com/deep-code/situational-assessment-2017-trump-edition-d189d24fc046
Sorry.
Yes and no. Dialectic v Rhetoric. Most people do not understand dialectic nor can be swayed by it. Most people are about the feelz/rhetoric. My opinion? this dude slayed because he combined both. The facts were put out there while conveying the "you dumb sloot" rhetoric. To me, that is what the memes are and the twats of 140 characters. Get the rhetorical shiv in, and maybe infect with some facts. Dialectic alone wont win the majority.
Earlier i had posted about an article, but forgotten the link. I then posted the link but I would like to post a small bit of it because this is what q and the chans and anons are:
The conflict of the 21st Century is about forming a Collective Intelligence that can outwit and out innovate all of its competitors. The central challenge is to innovate a way of collaborating and cohering individuals that maximally deploys their individual perspectives, capabilities, understandings and insights with each-other. Right now, the Insurgency has the edge. It has discovered some key ways to tap into the power of decentralized collective intelligence and this is its principal advantage. While it is definitely not a mature version of a decentralized collective intelligence, it is substantially more so than any collective intelligence with which it is competing and unless and until a more effective decentralized collective intelligence enters the field, this advantage is enough.
https:// medium.com/deep-code/situational-assessment-2017-trump-edition-d189d24fc046
there. I remembered to add the link IN the post. Thank you