dChan
Anonymous ID: af0c73 Feb. 19, 2018, 2:40 p.m. No.434086   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4091 >>4100 >>4296 >>4726

>>434011 (last bread)

Was there for this initial debate, and I still say the same, which is I don't know. WikiLeaks didn't confirm it. Does WikiLeaks have EVERYTHING though? No. NSA & MI do, could very well have come from them, or another source other than WL source. Or, its as fake as some anons say it is. Still, future proves past, not know it all anons. I don't know if it's real or fake, don't care at the moment. I do care that it's archived.

>[Nothing is ever truly deleted].

>ARCHIVE EVERYTHING OFFLINE.

Anonymous ID: af0c73 Feb. 19, 2018, 2:48 p.m. No.434139   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4160

>>434091

Yes, as follows:

>Not from WL.

>[CLAS-N-DI_9] gg_dump [No Such Agency].

>It does not technically exist as open-source.

 

Just went back to it, CLAS. If classified no anon w/o SEC Clearance can confirm or deny, we only have Q's word to go on. Made sense to me then, makes sense to me now. If it were to show up in a future drop of (by then) unclassified data, then it's settled.

 

>>434100

>I don't care if it's fake or not. I record the events.

My point exactly!

Q-uotes:

>We can guide but you must organically uncover the TRUTH.

>THEY are watching.

>ARCHIVE EVERYTHING OFFLINE.

Anonymous ID: af0c73 Feb. 19, 2018, 3:22 p.m. No.434362   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>434296

>The city does not exist (check it on maps.google.com and the person does not exist. I tried to run a background check on that person and they are not in the database anywhere in the US.

RE_read what you typed, slowly and carefully.

 

Now, what city, because there's no city listed in the email? And, pseudonyms, anyone can use them. Also, how do you search for a person on google maps? Bonus: Do you trust Goggle maps?