>>4340021 (pb)
Learn some basic astronomy, please. That would improve the signal-to-noise ratio quite a bit in all these astronomy-related discussions.
>>4340021 (pb)
Learn some basic astronomy, please. That would improve the signal-to-noise ratio quite a bit in all these astronomy-related discussions.
>>4340296 (lb)
At end of the video, the narrator says it's 5:30 AM. It would be helpful to have non-doxxing information about latitude, longitude and general direction the camera was pointed. Was he looking slightly south (to the right) of due east? My first candidate is Venus. Eliminate the obvious before jumping to aliens.
Thanks, that's the kind of confirming/disconfirming information I was looking for. The level of strangeness just went higher.
Do you own an iPad or something similar? There is at least one astronomy app that allows you to point at the sky and get identifiers, like looking through an enhanced-reality window.
I sympathize. Also, when you do not see the mystery object, do you still see Venus?
Notice that I am not throwing up Venus as a catch-all debunking. Right now, Venus really is brightly visible in the east before sunrise.
I'm with you, basically.
I first heard this from, of all people, Webster Tarpley. Tarpley put out the idea that that Snowden was still working an op for the CIA, using his contractor employment to infiltrate the NSA in a turf war. The effect was to put all the bad attention on the NSA … while nobody looked at the CIA anymore.
I noted his interpretation, but disbelieved it. Am now back to reconsidering it. But maybe Snowden was fooled into thinking he was on the right side.
I stopped listening to Tarpley when his TDS got totally deranged. Later, he was sued by Melania Trump, and lost, on account of how he phrased some of his wild charges.