lawfag here
very interesting post here on the latest secret court battle
this poster claims it is a dispute about transfer of a cases(s) or proecceding to an article one court
to be honest i never heard of that and quick look offers no easy answers but will dig and post when i understand what they are referring to or other anons weigh in
carry on frens
lawfag here again
found what i wanted
the article 1 courts are set up with ther "implied p[owers" given to congress in article one
SCOTUS keeps a close and jealous eye on these to limit their use and not permit infirngement on the judicial branch
congress has a whole slew of these courts inc. tax court, veterans appeals, claims vs fed govt,, bakruptcy BUT MOST NOTEWORTHY
is the
Court of Military Commission Review
The United States Court of Military Commission Review reviews military commission cases submitted to the court.
The court is composed of panels of at least three appellate military judges.
The court was created in 2009 after Congress passed the Military Commissions Act of 2009, which allowed the rights of the accused in military commissions to be expanded
if these posts are correct and the dispute centers on this the fight is whether or not to transfer a mueller inquiry to military court!
dont know who is pushing what - yet
apparently some anons didnt read the initial post
anon posted a thred with a person claiming to be an elected official and stating that the secret proceedings the other day where they sealed the courthouse involves a tranfer of case to an ARTICLE 1 COURT
article THREE sets up SCOTUS and the judicial branch - NOT article one
lawfag here
no sauce but notable IMO
if you do please pick up my posts on the big issue there - article 1 courts
yeah your shitposting gives you away
yes there are many many many admin judges in the article one system but also many "regular" judges esp bankruptcy and tax courts
the ones i listed are more or less true courts
but there are hundreds of admin judges in every fucking bureacracy
its a disaster
didnt read the whole link but it appears to be an upgrade for admin judges so they can have longer and more stable tenure
sounds more DS that GA to me but i did not dig
from one POV yes i agree
but it might the exact opposite - "someone" wants it in military not civilian
time will tell
yeah the lesson is you should have posted on penthouse forum not here
have you read the koran?
lawfag here
bAker an anon posted a very good clip from the EO this bread
ill try to find it but not too good on searching it was a reply to one of my posts - sorry