Anonymous ID: b71b7d Dec. 16, 2018, 5:55 p.m. No.4340907   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0919 >>1423

Air Force Research Lab tweeting elf on the shelf and work being done at the South Pole on the LANDIT Telescope.

 

https://twitter.com/AFResearchLab/with_replies?lang=en

Anonymous ID: b71b7d Dec. 16, 2018, 6:08 p.m. No.4341055   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1090 >>1115 >>1229 >>1397 >>1439

>>4340920

lawfag, are article 1 courts administrative courts/administrative judges?

 

If yes - think this EO from 7/10/18 might be related? Maybe some dots to be connected?

 

Excepting Administrative Law Judges From the Competitive Service

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2018/07/13/2018-15202/excepting-administrative-law-judges-from-the-competitive-service

Anonymous ID: b71b7d Dec. 16, 2018, 6:27 p.m. No.4341229   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1264 >>1397 >>1439

>>4341115

>>4341055

 

Summary of that EO

"Earlier this month, President Trump issued an executive order that would allow agency heads to pick whomever they wish to be administrative law judges, provided they are active lawyers or judges. Previously, the Office of Personnel Management would independently vet candidates, and then submit to agencies a short list of potential names."

 

Sounds like POTUS was trying to streamline the hiring process for admin judges. Maybe get ready for an influx of cases?

 

Q has told us the judicial branch is dirty.

Maybe whitehats are trying to get these cases heard w/article 1 judges and avoid the corrupt dirty Federal Court judges and the cabal is fighting back?

 

https://www.govexec.com/oversight/2018/07/article-casts-doubt-legality-trumps-administrative-law-judge-eo/149919/