>>4342580 pb
This post got me thinking about the kinds of posts we create here to share information.
QResearch research posts
in approximate order of detail & synthesis. After LEVEL 1, more complex doesn't necessarily mean more useful…..
LEVEL 1. Sketchy but potentially useful info that lacks sauce (no links) or that has 'iffy" sauce–(Sorcha Faal, etc.) With a little digging, might be tasty. Includes screenshots that lack captions, explanatory headlines, or other callouts; a 2-3 sentence caption makes a huge difference in readability.
LEVEL 2. Current affairs and press releases (copy-pasta, "just-the-facts" short articles): Zerohedge, Breitbart, often breaking stories. Great for catching up on the news. Also includes self-explanatory screenshots with BIG PRINT headlines that summarize the main idea.
LEVEL 3. Short but sweet idea summaries by anons involved in digs and discussions; usually a combo of facts, speculations and ideas for diggs. Great for communicating hive mind activity in a particular area.
LEVEL 4. Longer articles, govt/tech reports, often sauced with technical citations & a helpful interpretation by knowledge specialists like lawfags or engineers.
LEVEL 5. Complex data, syntheses, fact collections, graphics sometimes with extensive analysis by anons, e.g., the linking/explaining of related Q posts, clockfag analyses, legal interpretations of laws, etc. Improved by OP's taking the time to briefly explain graphical relationships in words.
Note: This list does not include the wonderful memes, poems, songs, artwork, bible passages and other material that adds so much to the work but is not primarily analytical.