Using a little anti narrative logic….

Macron made a move to hike taxes steeply during the course of Q, which we understand now to be WW in optical exposure and must presume it was so at the time the decision was made.

In a position where Macron is, knowing the shitpot is stirring and the flames were long since lit and the contents were near boiling, is it a truly logical strategic move to protect country and citizens? I don't think one may have country without the citizens, and therefor, the citizens themselves are the key to a country's well being. Was this move actually a plan in action to instigate the very response from the people? What would be the benefits. Macron seems always quite ready to simply fly away at a moments notice, disappear from the MSM and public view.

A game of "here, fishy, fishy?"

Manipulation may run deeper than many understand sometimes, and, deeper than many are willing to go. What also springs into mind is the simple fact that while it is insinuated the uprising began when news hit that there was to be a tax hike, implying a direct need of money at the citizens behest. Lo and behold, the need for money is no longer there when Macron offered to pay in the form of min wage hike in 1 month…..implying they never needed money in the first place but have a course of action, apparently, to actually PAY more money out to the citizens. Complete stupidity in my own opinion, but blatant, nonetheless, and in need of scrutiny.

>>4344719

did you notice the UID's in the pb was at 150 and dropped right off this bread? Might just be me though I suppose.

>>4344767

read a bit more into it……who says "riot?" Macron is the one pushing police presence into darker territory. FEAR, or as I broke it all down in a prev post, TACTIC?

>>4345019

"elections have consequences"

this was spoken in a manner insinuating direct threat, unlikely it was a direct threat to POTUS, but more likely to "incidents" CS acts as though he thinks POTUS is unaware of having the capacity to be carried out as planned.