Anonymous ID: 33a84a Dec. 17, 2018, 2:29 a.m. No.4344973   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4994

>>4344486 pb

 

what does that delta stuff even mean?

 

It doesn't really mean anything at all, unless you believe in it.

 

As I understand it, this delta stuff is supposed to be some sort of timing clue as to when stuff is supposed to happen? Q says X in relation to some sort of Trump Tweet, and the closeness or distance in time from the Trump tweet. But it doesn't really matter, its just an extremely complicated "explanation" of why what Q says hasn't come true.

 

We're supposed to have gotten, over a year ago, Podesta and Huma arrests. All our great thinkers are hard at work, all believing in this weird clock with deltas and everything else, but the things never happen.

Anonymous ID: 33a84a Dec. 17, 2018, 3:44 a.m. No.4345250   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4344972

 

I mean, no End The Fed means we're not getting what we want, but Trump didn't run on End The Fed.

 

We'd like to think that Q is an insider who is giving us perfect information direct from the White House.

 

This many not at all be true. It could be Corsi, who is involved in this whole thing for reasons I'm not quite sure about. It could've started with one person and became different people.

 

Whoever it is, a person, group, I'd think that the White House knows about it, and might or might not be able to make use of whatever it is that we're doing here. A group that includes a bunch of people that want what Q is selling, and a bunch of people who don't like what we're doing here, for whatever reason, so they're intentionally trying to wreck our experience here.

 

Oh, so, Podesta isn't arrested, Huma isn't arrested - things that could be done quickly, and we know this, are we really expecting to get End The Fed? From what Trump has actually done, finished, accomplished, and not tweeted about or made a hand gesture signalling approval or whatever code we use to determine that the President loves US, the conspiracy theorists?

 

Here's something that I noticed a long time ago. I was here (4) since the beginning or at least first week. So it starts with bombshell allegations and those are discussed, and then, pretty quickly, the conversation turns to conspiracy theories, and I was in on those conversations. And I was mentioning, this was before Q got to the triangle, how almost every conspiracy theory has Rothschilds right in the middle of them, and Soros is the main guy, funded by Rothschilds currently, operationally, the guy who does the stuff. And shortly after Rothschild appears in the Q story. Q's story was sticking to DC political types, more than 200 year old richest family types, but we zoomed there, and now we're here. But if I hadn't mentioned Rothschild, maybe the story we're hearing from Q, in some specifics but not others, is different. Certainly it would have Comey and Mueller and Rosenstein certainly but if we were all a bunch of neocons, there might be more of how the Muslims are bad and less of the bad Jews taking prominent roles.

 

Maybe. From the start, that was a big hmmm to me, but I like this story. Random peoples facebook pages don't have this story like it's being told here. These are outcomes we want.