Repost for visibility

Judge grants Flynn request to make a 302 public

His actual interview 302 from January?

https://twitter.com/big_cases/status/1074760965059735552

>>4350014

>Hold my hand and 'splain why you said the court granted Flynn leave to file 302s unsealed.

You are correct - I was passing on a hot take from someone clearly not a lawfag.

>>4349991

It's about a missing filing.

There are a whole bunch of docket filings that simply don't even show up.

48, 49, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55

This new order allows Flynn to respond to #51 under seal.

>>4350124

See…

>>4350184

There is A LOT going on behind the scenes.

They don't want to reveal the plot twist too early.

I think the indictment today of his Turkey lobbying partners was a HUGE step forward in revealing another leg of the stool.

The end is near.

>>4350248

It is in reference to Order #51, which is itself under seal, along with a bunch of other documents.

It makes me think that Mueller DID file the 302s along with a number of other things, all under seal.

>>4350184

We are seeing less than 50% of the activity in this case.

Why didn't Comey tell Yates?

Or is it (more likely) all a bullshit cover story to protect each other?

Ocasio swallowing redpills

She is going to accidentally expose the whole swamp in front of millions of followers.