>>436008 >>435936

>Fake

<it's not that balck/white.

Does complete bullshit make a good lie? No, it needs parts of truth.

So does a fake, like reusing real old canvases for new forgeries…

This is only partly a fake. Only those that have written/seen the original know exactly.

Likely, the text is all true and only the names have been modified.

It was never intended to be publicly accepted as real: wikileaks had to publicly denounce it as fake.

But that person who went to a not-a-code CollectiveSoul concert knows.

And they know that whoever put that out knows.

That should not be too hard to understand.

>>436220

good.

you should be worried when you are not

muh anons doing side-by-side photo reconnaissance RESEARCH

>>436306

>LOOK LIKE IDIOTS

that's the point

>>436324

They can't, it's posed as a false dilemma.

Does complete bullshit make a good lie? No, it needs parts of truth.

So does a fake, like reusing real old canvases for new forgeries…

This is only partly a fake. Only those that have written/seen the original know exactly.

Likely, the text is all true and only the names have been modified.

It was never intended to be publicly accepted as real: wikileaks had to publicly denounce it as fake.

But that person who went to a not-a-code CollectiveSoul concert knows.

And they know that whoever put that out knows.

It was a message.

Dismissing it simply as "fake" is missing the point, COMPLETELY.

Here, at this point, though, it is obvious misdirection.

>>436369

>MK Ultra project ended in the 1960s

Scoop: they got caught.

They had to change name/go deeper