Long road Anons
Think a little harder.
The bite on the Apple logo is always on the right hand side.
The Shills graphic is using an Apple logo that is not only backwards / wrong, but highly distorted.
Q was smart enough to know this.
KEK.
This may go over your head a bit, but we can try.
Q took a photo of an iPhone with AF1 in the reflection.
That is why the logo is correct in Q's photo, and the reflection is flipped. Just like you would expect.
The "source" photos are not even a match. Watch how the crystal piece next to the lamp jumps around in the gif. The desk top disappears, the magazines jump, and the wood work doesn't line up.
The pixel quality is also too low in the "source" image to accomplish what you think happened. Zoom in all the way an look at the pixel quality. Very different.
If they are the same image then they would be the same, but anyone honest can see they are not.
The true austic anons can look at the optical distortion created by the iPhones surface that is outside of the focal plain. It creates artifacts that photoshop can't help you with.
You are wrong.
Your theory is that Q took a photo of a mirror (that reversed the logo) of the iPhone with the source photo in the iPhones reflection?
Really?
This is the optical distortion I'm talking about.
It's caused by the iPhone being outside of the focal plain of the camera.
This distortion is interacting with with the reflection that is inside of the focal plain and in focus.
There is no way to fake this.
Adding another mirror to flip the logo like you claim would only increase the distance from the iPhone and place the iPhone in the focal plain.
In sheep talk. The iPhone is very close to the camera. Adding a mirror would have put the Apple logo in focus.
There is no source image.
The ABC photo is not the same.
Similar is not the goal.
Pixel 4 pixel they should be exact if they are the same, but I circled some easy things that are 100% not the same.
Look closer
KEK
The source image would not need to be flipped for the logo to be correct.
Think about that one a bit harder.
Q would have to start with a flipped source photo to get the logo backwards.
The fact that you need to flip and distort the Apple logo debunks your theory, but I can see why it is over your head.
Q chose us for a reason.
If the proof are too good the game is over.
One more issue. Where is this source photo?