Anonymous ID: 0e2cf7 Dec. 18, 2018, 5:21 a.m. No.4358468   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8480 >>8494 >>8806

Interesting choice of words

 

Michael Flynn, President Trump’s first national security adviser who began cooperating with special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation about a year ago, will be sentenced Tuesday for lying to the FBI.

 

Flynn's appearance in D.C. federal court before U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan will be viewed as a key milestone in an investigation that has prodded along for 19 months amidst high public intrigue and increasing vitriol from the president.

 

It is arguably the most highly anticipated sentencing yet in Mueller's investigation, and comes on the heels of the three-year sentence handed down to Trump’s former personal attorney Michael Cohen for a slew of federal charges that sprung from details uncovered by Mueller’s sprawling probe.

 

Flynn is unlikely to be sentenced to significant prison time. Citing his “substantial assistance” in ongoing investigations, Mueller recommended a lenient sentence for Flynn and has not asked for any jail time.

 

But Flynn and his attorneys may have scrambled his situation by arguing that Flynn was entrapped by the FBI into lying about his Russia contacts, giving new life to a theory among conservatives that the one-time Trump campaign surrogate was wronged by the Justice Department and Mueller.

 

Flynn’s defense attorneys asked the court to spare him from prison and sentence him to at most one-year probation last week. They cited an FBI report stating that agents did not warn Flynn of the penalties for making a false statement “because they wanted Flynn to be relaxed, and they were concerned that giving the warnings might adversely affect the rapport.”

 

Without disputing Mueller’s characterization of the crime, they argued Sullivan should consider the circumstances of his interview when evaluating “the seriousness of the offense.”

 

The court filing added fresh drama to Flynn’s case and prompted Sullivan, who has a reputation as a hawk for any government misconduct, to ask Mueller to produce documents related to Flynn’s interview, which the special counsel filed in redacted form on Friday and Monday.

 

It also inspired a firm rebuke from Mueller, who wrote that Flynn “chose” to lie and asserted that Flynn, a retired three-star Army general and former chief of the Defense Intelligence Agency, “knows he should not lie to federal agents.”

 

Mueller also asked Sullivan to reject Flynn’s attempt to “minimize the seriousness of those false statements to the FBI.”

 

The developments have energized conservatives who have speculated that Flynn was mistreated by the FBI and duped into lying. One of the agents who interviewed Flynn was former agent Peter Strzok, who became a popular target among Republicans after a Justice Department inspector general probe unearthed text messages he sent critical of Trump prior to the 2016 election.

 

Trump himself suggested last week that Mueller’s prosecutors gave Flynn a “great deal because they were embarrassed by the way he was treated” and attempted to “scare” him into making up stories. The president has also seized on accounts that agents did not observe outward signs indicating Flynn knew he was lying as evidence his former national security adviser was wrongly ensnared Mueller’s probe.

 

Some legal experts say that the decision by Flynn to cast his FBI interview as deceptive could backfire, if the judge views him as downplaying his culpability.

 

“I think it’s kind of surprising, and actually potentially risky on his part,” said Randall Eliason, a George Washington University law professor and former assistant U.S. attorney in D.C. “That could actually work against him.”

 

Federal sentencing guidelines call for Flynn to face between zero and six months in prison and up to a $9,500 fine. Others ensnared in Mueller’s probe who have pleaded guilty to the same offense received small sentences, including George Papadopoulos, a former Trump campaign adviser who was released from prison after 12 days.

 

Flynn, once a vocal Trump campaign surrogate, served less than a month in the White House before he was forced to resign over revelations he misled Vice President Pence and other administration officials about his conversations with then-Russian ambassador Sergey Kislyak regarding sanctions on Moscow during the transition.

Cont. Here:

https://thehill.com/policy/national-security/421774-flynn-sentencing-marks-keystone-moment-in-mueller-investigation

Anonymous ID: 0e2cf7 Dec. 18, 2018, 5:55 a.m. No.4358758   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9057 >>9150

Several reports stating LL is testifying tomorrow behind closed doors. No sauce to back up claim so who knows.

 

https://www.cnn.com/2018/12/17/politics/james-comey-congress-fbi/index.html

 

https://wset.com/news/nation-world/comey-questioned-for-role-in-flynn-questioning

 

https://www.chicagotribune.com/suburbs/post-tribune/opinion/ct-ptb-milbank-column-st-1218-story,amp.html

Anonymous ID: 0e2cf7 Dec. 18, 2018, 6:16 a.m. No.4358970   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Critics call it anti-Semitic, saying it places Holocaust revisionism at the center of an odious and addled worldview. Its title has been borrowed by followers of QAnon, a conspiracy movement that favors President Trump and peddles baseless theories about government secrets and cabals.

 

But Alice Walker, the Pulitzer-Prize-winning author of “The Color Purple,” calls “And the Truth Shall Set You Free” by David Icke a “curious person’s dream come true.” She offered this endorsement in a New York Times interview published in print on Sunday, in which the 74-year-old author said that the 1995 book was among those resting on her nightstand. “In Icke’s books there is the whole of existence, on this planet and several others, to think about,” she said.

 

It was not Walker’s approval of Icke’s work that most troubled observers, who noted that she has previously declared her affinity for his delusive writing and stated, in a poem last year, that the evils of the Talmud could be discovered by watching YouTube videos. Rather, some decried the decision by the Times to relay her recommendation to readers without qualification.

 

The criticism opened a debate about the gate-keeping responsibilities of mainstream news outlets and the path taken by poisonous lies into polite discourse — matters of serious significance as societies newly wired by social media weigh how to separate fact from fiction, especially when false accounts are so often laced with hate. At stake in the flap were also charged questions about how to separate art from an artist’s worldview, as well as whether moral codes should police creative taste.

 

Alice Walker has been anti-Semitic for years. I talk about it at my events when I talk about how much I appreciate Possessing the Secret of Joy.

— roxane gay (@rgay) December 17, 2018

 

Icke is a former professional soccer player and popular BBC presenter who now disseminates conspiracy theories in self-published books and on YouTube. He claims to have had a psychic revelation nearly 20 years ago that led him to rebrand as “Son of the Godhead” and to promote the idea that a race of reptilian humanoids, widely viewed as a stand-in for Jews, is secretly running the world.

Cont.:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2018/12/18/new-york-times-criticized-alice-walker-interview-touting-book-that-blames-jews-holocaust/?utm_term=.93b3758d2eac