>>4357800 lb

>Is there anyone who doesnt know the history of ((()))?

Well, in the very replies to the post you're quoting, someone (>>4356626 pb) says, "Most people have no clue of the anti-Semitic usage". Now, granted, I suspect that's a (((subversive))) trying to redefine the language so that it can no longer be used to name him, and so that all previous naming of him will be lost to new eyes who, stumbling upon echoes in the wild, will misinterpret them as having whatever new meaning they've been told it has, and that it meant Jews at the time will be lost. But still, the matter doesn't appear to be as settled as you make it seem.

I believe you know, but in case anyone doesn't, we are in an all-out information war here – a meme war. Controlling the language enables you to control thought. Feel free to re-read Orwell on the matter. ((())) means Jew, or Jewish influence. It may have also meant cyber-hug at some point, but when Julian Assange tweeted out, "Tribalist symbol for establishment climbers? Most of our critics have 3 (((brackets around their names))) & have black rim glasses. Bizzare" it didn't mean cyber-hug. He was attacked for his antisemitic tweet, which he then deleted, but he immortalized that fairly recent moment in time, during the pushback against the rising popularity of the antisemitic echoes, when Jews and their allies wore their affiliation to Judaism proudly, on twitter, in defiance of antisemitism, by putting echoes around their name.

So, it means Jew. I know it, they know it enough to use it defiantly and claim antisemitism when it's mentioned, you seem to know it, apparently that one anon I quoted earlier thinks people don't know it, and who knows how many people will feign ignorance to try to change its meaning, but it doesn't mean cyber-hug, or Cabal, except in the context of the Cabal actually being Jews, or Jewish in nature. Unless you think that all of those people throwing echoes around their name at the time of Assange's tweet were proudly and defiantly declaring their affiliation with, and allegiance to the Cabal, in which case we should probably be making and keeping a thorough list of them all. You should be very suspicious of anyone attempting to change the language out from under the conversation because, whether they know it or not, or will admit it or not, they are attempting to control your mind.

>The thing is that (((wwg1wga))) and (((+))) are unrelated.

There are multiple meanings to things. Do you know that they're unrelated? Are you not concerned about one possible meaning being lost? I don't know that Q used it to mean Jew, or Jewish, and I tend to agree with you that he probably didn't, but that is its common meaning, which is exactly what the notable post said, quote, "Whatever Q meant by (((WWG1WGA))) and whatever (((+))) means, the way the (((echo))) meme is used on the chans is to call out Jews."

>I am for good baking and against agenda pushes from either side

Repeating truths when assailed by lies is not agenda pushing. Holding the truth down, and the truthful silent, when they are assailed by lies, by presenting their reaffirmation of known truths as "agenda pushing", is itself agenda pushing – whether by ignorance, or complicity.

>Want to push an agenda - dont bake.

Thank God you don't bake.