>>4359210 (lb)
>For instance, their strong opposition to homosexuality rests entirely on verses from the Old testament, right next to other verses that they think must be "interpreted" to modern standards.
this is false. the opposition is generally theological and not rooted in the torah. it is generally rooted in Paul's analogy between the marital relationship and the relationship between christ and the church.
>And the fighting, the name calling and the chasing away OVER QUESTIONS, is getting real fucking old. If you're too old, and too cranky to interact with people, lurk. If you don't know an answer, just shut the fuck up, don't attack someone.
you just assume that every question is a good question. but the whole "there is no such thing as a bad question" is just part of the process of destroying our culture. for several thousand years western culture taught that questions were sacred. that questions needed to be carefully cultivated. that many (if not most questions) that people ask are….wait for it….bad fucking questions. so, yes I attack bad questions on here all the time. not to chase anons away, but to try and get them to look at the right questions. people need to re-learn this shit. it just is the case that some questions are better than others, and some questions are just bad.
>Never heard that motivation from a Christian before.
then youve never spoken to an one that is educated to a reasonable level.
you pick out all kinds of surface level shit and present it as prima facia evidence of inconsistency. its just too fucking stupid.
your view requires that we see all of the philosophers and theologians throughout history as fooled by a text rife with obvious inconsistency. it is a stupid fucking view. augustine is not fooled by this. and yet he sees a consistent way forward and fills volumes with his thoughts on this.
read some of the classic texts of western philosophy and theology and then get back to me.
>So you basically admit to blatantly helping a shill slide the bread?
>
>ffs get ahold of yourself
hehehe shill eh……i would be happy to have my history hashed by BO and shown to the fucking world. the conclusion wont be that this anon is a shill…..
recovery from Wright Brothers appreciation day methinks.
>You want newfags to come here and learn?
my point is that one of the things that need to be learned is that many questions are bad questions. were my history to be hashed you would also find me supporting the rehash of notables. no issue with that at all. and you will also find that plenty of questions are answered by this anon. what we shouldnt tolerate is sloppy fucking thinking and sloppy views on important topics like christianity and western philosophy and culture.
>Every CUSTOM of this board was imposed by the AI system FROM THE VERY START.
>
>The most obvious proof of this is that the "culture" of this board is EXACTLY IDENTICAL to that of 4chan /pol/, even though it is absurd to think that would come about organically.
this is just fucking stupid. the culture is like /pol because that is where this started and it was those types of anons that started it. how fucking hard is it to imagine that happening? the customs of this board have a history. a common history to many of the oldfags here. and it seems to this anon obvious that the culture of the oldfags is going to be very hard to break. and it just is refreshing to be able to be direct in communication and to employ ridicule for ideas that make no sense or that are wildly at odds with the basic assumptions of the research here.
>Anyone starting to think that Flynn Jr talking about Pizzagate being real was MI planning.
anything Jr. talks about is MI planning in my opinion. why would Sr. let his kid run around spouting counter productive shit? he wouldnt.
>You're spending a lot of energy screaming and arguing with a shill bot, anon.
i know anon, i enjoy it. and enjoy making the reasons for rejecting them clear….if only for myself.