>>4363886

JFC Concernfag

using a percentage from 12 years ago to try and make a comparison to a count from >6 on the ago to “guess” a representation.

It’s a different time. The sealed indictments are twice what they were 12 years ago, i will concede. And yet they base their whole method on what THEY believe Qanon followers believe.

We know it’s not just fucking pedophiles. We know that there is corruption all over the place. Numerous different types of cases in different jurisdiction and crimes.

Trying to label it in only one category of crimes is THE EXACT SAME FUCKING THING THE ARTICLE IS TRYING TO DEBUNK.

For fuck sake, no wonder it’s just a random fucking thread someone posted.

I bet you’re real proud of your work.

Time for you to go back to being useless and relevant.

>>4363886

maybe you can fool some normies

make some liberals even more smug

but deep down in your heart you’ll know that the basis for the debunk is just as preposterous as the claim that they are all sealed pedophile cases