>>4363833

lawfag here

NOTABLE analysis anon

yes calling the filings 100% indictments was always a bit of a fudge - but nothing compared to the heaps of BS MSM puts out - not to mention paid doubters like the one you reply to

so as you suggest if there are "only" 600-700 actual indictments that IS still huge and even if we concede that ALL the other filings are NOT indoctments (and we have NO evidcence for that) then what are all these proceedings?

could be thr shitstorm of fights already underway on secret from folks who KNOW their name is on the list

2018 WAS glorious - all the proof has not emrged YET

>>4363921

>I want

says it all

>>4363939

>Question:

>Your best guess, what were the additional doc.s submitted by Flynn's Atty.?

i dont know anon

not enough for any kind of educated guess and no feelz at all

numbness set back in…..

KEK

ill look into it tho

>>4363971

>Roxli Doss

roxlidoss

sounds like a pharma RX

>>4364111

yes of course

sorry for the snark fren

>>4364048

her dad was hollywood cabal all the way

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garry_Marshall

>>4364064

any one that uses a bump stock is a complete idiot

this is a manufactured throwaway