Anonymous ID: 1db8de Dec. 18, 2018, 1:10 p.m. No.4364892   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4929

>>4364033 pb

 

Re: Berkeley scientists developing artificial intelligence tool to combat ‘hate speech’ on social media

 

Whatever the topic, the Left wants to control the narrative. And when it comes to speech, they want to control "bad" speech. To justify this, they have to make a connection between speech and action, showing that

 

BAD SPEECH >>BAD ACTS

 

This is a critical assumption. Without it, they can't justify "anti-hate" speech codes.

 

To defeat this approach requires us to CHALLENGE this root assumption, over and over again.

 

It has never been empirically shown that hate speech leads to hateful acts, either in the person speaking or in others who hear them. There is, at best, a CORRELATION. And correlation does not equal causation.

 

Also, with correlation, the relationship can run either way, where hateful acts can lead to hateful speech. So abused children may become abusive adults–and this will probably be reflected in their speech.

 

Any approach that works is based primarily on changing habits (behavior), not speech. But the Left will never focus on that, because their goal has nothing to do with diminishing hatred. Only with destroying our ability to clearly communicate what we genuinely see, feel, and think.

Anonymous ID: 1db8de Dec. 18, 2018, 1:21 p.m. No.4365026   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4364929

Well-said–it's the window I'm thinking about. Letting them get away with the claim that hate speech is a meaningful term. It's not. Every time a conversation begins, shift the focus back to free speech and make them define hate speech and then challenge their definition (it will never be sufficient).

Anonymous ID: 1db8de Dec. 18, 2018, 1:32 p.m. No.4365151   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Re: https://www.france24.com/en/20181218-belgian-pm-resigns-coalition-comes-under-pressure

 

>>4365085

Actually, don't think this article is in notables. The one that you cite here is in…hmmm…Dutch, I think. I was just going to add the article for this one, because I like to sauce links.

Anonymous ID: 1db8de Dec. 18, 2018, 1:41 p.m. No.4365272   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5319 >>5333 >>5367

>>4365038

NOT in notables, not THIS article.

However, it's quite brief. Try this one:

 

Belgian premier nixes early polls, then submits resignation

 

BRUSSELS

Belgian Prime Minister Charles Michel submitted his resignation Tuesday amid pressure on his government after the biggest party in his coalition quit over his support for a United Nations compact on international migration.

 

"I am taking the decision to offer my resignation. I am now going to see the king" to inform him," Michel told Belgian lawmakers.

 

The lawmakers had been demanding that he submit his new minority government to a confidence vote, but Michel refused and a confrontation this week seemed likely.

 

Michel tried to convince them of the reshaped government's plans and said he would be ready to work with the opposition, but his overtures were rejected. His 2019 budget was among the sensitive topics up for debate.

 

Some in the assembly pushed for an election to be held before the regularly scheduled one in May. Michel again refused, saying it would only lead to "stagnation for the whole of 2019."

 

As lawmakers applauded, he picked up his briefcase, shook the hands of a number of government ministers, and left. Michel made no comment to reporters upon entering and leaving Belgian King Philippe's residence, the Palace of Laeken in Brussels.

 

The king holds a largely symbolic role in Belgium but becomes a pivotal figure after inconclusive elections or disputes like the current one require the formation of new governments.

 

In a tweet, the Royal Palace said Philippe had received Michel and was "withholding his decision" about what steps to take next. It was not immediately clear whether the king had accepted the resignation the prime minister tendered on behalf of himself and his government.

 

Michel could be invited to lead a caretaker government until consultations with other party leaders can be held.

 

The right-wing N-VA party quit the government after Michel sought parliamentary approval to support the U.N. compact against its wishes, branding his minority government "the Marrakech coalition," after the city where the migration treaty was signed just over a week ago.

 

The accord is non-binding, but the N-VA said it still went too far and would give even migrants who were in Belgium without authorization many additional rights.

 

The party launched an in-your-face social media campaign against the compact, featuring pictures of Muslim women with their faces covered and claiming that the accord focused on allowing migrants to retain the cultural practices of their homelands. But it quickly withdrew the materials after the campaign received widespread criticism.

 

A number of governments refused to sign the U.N. Global Compact Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration. They included the United States, but also a group of European Union countries, among them Austria which holds the EU's rotating presidency until Dec. 31.

 

https://www.sanluisobispo.com/news/business/article223264680.html