>>4364399 pb
Reading it is even more infuriating than watching it.
>https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/Comey-Interview-Part-Two.pdf
Got sauce?
Ok, I went looking for sauce, have heard this story but….sauce in not very good, mostly questionnable sources. This obit might be ok, but not sure:
https://www.legacy.com/obituaries/name/todd-madison-obituary?pid=187520772
ZERO MSM coverage. Even for the MSM, that seems highly suspicious. Did he really die for sure?
notable
Many excellent points here without demonizing anyone–except maybe those who purposely try to undermine the Board and all those who participate:
BAKERS get attacked for including "bad" posts or excluding "good" ones
DIGGERS get attacked for citing "bad" sources (paytriots, traitors, etc; some maybe made "bad" by previous shills), repeating notables (even when not true), not having sauce for well-stated opinion pieces (where the "sauce" is the argument itself)
OR (more often) get ignored or denigrated for their observations; told asking for notables is bad/selfish, etc.
EVERY PATRIOT gets attacked with foul pics and language, accusations, and anything else shills can dream up to wear us down
God bless every one of you for persisting nonetheless
WWG1WGA
Who cares?
Yeah, I saw the SGT stuff–probably the best source of the lot. But most of them I've never even heard of. And one of them had the word "gossip" in it…..
I like the phrase "cloak of satire"
Fake satire
Real satire is playful (think Tucker C)
Fake satire inserts little black barbs
Like some shills do here
Been years since I thought about Our Man Flint
Wow
WTF is your problem with spacing?
Here it is: reddit spacing
Notice how it makes the text really easy to read!
Want lots of citations of research from 1970s forward?
If you're going to critique someone, pick a better argument
Like based on substance, not style
Sincerely yours,
Formatanon