Anonymous ID: 04433a Dec. 18, 2018, 3:23 p.m. No.4366431   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6620

>>4366194

>By the way, thanks for helping me out!

No problem.

 

Some anons on here are simply sick of shills, so I can understand it a bit.

 

I think there should be even a well sourced thread on this, so that attacks from this angle can be easily fully deflected.

 

I researched this because of a co-worker, who I'm feeding info every now and then and he read certain MSM articles, which used all sorts of fake news tricks, which you can easily fall for, when you do not know them.

Like:

"Little black book" - oh my gosh it's a pedo book (instead of using "all computer contacts")

Guilty by connection

Forgetting to mention certain facts

etc.

and told me something like you did.

 

When you read carefully, you see that they never say Trump did this or did that, because then they could be sued. They simply say this here and connect Trump by name and that's it. And most users simply connect them in their brains instead of thinking wait a minute, why do they do this and then mention Clinton being in those flight logs, but not Trump? So Trump wasn't in the flight logs, but they want me to believe he is.

Plus b) I need to read the original documents.

 

So much blah blah but when you are through, you see that they had literally nothing.

 

No surprise that they dropped this angle 2016.

 

I remember that Trump throwing Epstein out was mentioned in a book, and not one that Trump wrote. I would have to search on that again.

 

btw. I doubt that lefties will show up here - ever. Unless as shills.

When arrests happen, they will probably kill themselves or cry themselves to sleep.

Anonymous ID: 04433a Dec. 18, 2018, 3:35 p.m. No.4366620   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4366431

>>4366194

Ah right, I also remember MSM mentioning one woman suing Epstein + Trump - in 2016, what a coincidence. Just when Trump went for presidency.

 

First try was rejected by court.

I don't remember the details about second try.

Third try was stopped by that woman herself in Oct 2016, if I remember correctly.

 

And there were logical errors.

Like that woman "remembered" that it totally would have been Trump back then because she saw his "Apprentice" show.

But that show went for years and years, so why did she wait to sue until 2016?

And Trump is a widely known man anyway, at least within US.

 

Looked to me like the Kavanaugh technique.

 

And what did Fake News did w/ this?

They reported "a woman had sued Epstein and Trump" (not mentioning that it just happened, acting as if it had happened 5, 10, or 15 years ago). At least some articles didn't. Some articles did.

Some tried to make it feel as if it happened back then with the regular Epstein trials. 2003, right?

 

Anyway, as I said - it would be nice to have a well sourced and researched thread on this, so questions in that angle can be sent to the thread and be done.

Anonymous ID: 04433a Dec. 18, 2018, 3:48 p.m. No.4366794   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4366194

There you go.

 

http://www.gossipextra.com/2016/10/31/donald-trump-perv-jeffrey-epstein-mar-a-lago-6462-68165

 

Book by James Patterson

  • by John Connolly w/ Tim Malloy

"Filthy Rich"

 

According to a story in Chapter 33:

“That arrangement ended when a (Mar-a-Lago) member’s young daughter complained to her wealthy father: while relaxing at Mar-a-Lago, she’d been approached and invited out to Epstein’s house.

 

“The girl said that she had gone and that Epstein had tried to get her to undress.

 

“The girl’s father had gone directly to Trump, who — in no uncertain terms — told Epstein that he was barred from Mar-a-Lago.”

 

Another of Epstein’s victims, Virginia Roberts, said she was recruited in just the same way. She, however, wasn’t relaxing at Mar-a-Lago. She worked there.