Anonymous ID: 2d9f50 Dec. 18, 2018, 5:35 p.m. No.4368648   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8793 >>8796 >>9192

Baker- please make notable.

 

What if FLYNN was forced to lie as a result of Obama’s sealed “State Secrets” (classified EO filing)? And since Obama pardoned all bad actors, wouldn’t he also lock down all good actors by sealing/classifying any and all discussion of certain topics?

 

Recall that Q posted about this topic. And maybe the FBI/DOJ were monitoring all of FLYNN’s coms to make sure he didn’t “violate” the “State Secrets” filing by disclosing any of said classified info.

 

If I were half as clever as the white hats at DIA or FLYNN (who definitely knew their coms were tapped), I would somehow make it known to KISLYAK to ask a question about a certain topic in such a way that would “force” him to lie.

 

Maybe the FBI/DOJ guys on the surveillance team didn’t know about the “State Secrets” filing, so as far as they were concerned, they caught a legitimate lie to store as future control leverage on FLYNN.

Anonymous ID: 2d9f50 Dec. 18, 2018, 5:46 p.m. No.4368796   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4368648

TOP KEK! This jives with the dysfunction & changes of the 302 filings. Maybe they found out that the “lie” they were zeroing in on could have potentially brought the whole house down by exposing the State Secrets EO.

Anonymous ID: 2d9f50 Dec. 18, 2018, 6:08 p.m. No.4369192   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4368648

Lawfags, is there any precedent for “State Secrets” filings or classified pardons being disclosed as a result of civil/criminal court proceedings?

 

Q asked how to “legally” introduce evidence.