Baker- please make notable. “Theory - FLYNN lied to be compliant with Obama’s sealed EO related to State Secrets.”

What if FLYNN was forced to lie as a result of Obama’s sealed “State Secrets” (classified EO filing)? And since Obama pardoned all bad actors, wouldn’t he also lock down all good actors by sealing/classifying any and all discussion of certain topics?

Recall that Q posted about this topic. And maybe the FBI/DOJ were monitoring all of FLYNN’s coms to make sure he didn’t “violate” the “State Secrets” filing by disclosing any of said classified info. Q asked how do you legally introduce evidence. Perhaps Lawfags out there know of a precedent for classified “State Secret” EOs or pardons being disclosed as a result of civil/criminal court proceedings.

If I were half as clever as the white hats at DIA or FLYNN (who definitely knew their coms were tapped), I would somehow make it known to KISLYAK to ask a question about a certain topic in such a way that would “force” FLYNN to lie.

Maybe the FBI/DOJ guys on the surveillance team didn’t know about the “State Secrets” filing, so as far as they were concerned, they caught a legitimate lie to store as future control leverage on FLYNN. This could be why the FD-302 filings were so dysfunctional since they would have to alter the original if it contained a “lie” that would expose Obama’s Classified EO to keep quiet.